This text is from the Celsius Wiki, which was published between 2015 and 2018.
The heat hub in Rotterdam stores hot water from e.g. waste incineration and boiler plants, in order to balance heat supply and demand for Rotterdam’s district heating.
Utility-side thermal storage can be defined as storage that is made at the utility side of the energy-meter and can be more or less centralized such as large insulated hot water tanks or boreholes in the bedrock. This article describes the advantages with short term thermal storage to cut daily peaks in the heat load.
Thermal energy storage (TES) plays an important role in district heating and cooling systems (DHC), so is also in the case of the Celsius project. Within Celsius one can find several demonstrators integrating TES for the optimization of the heating and cooling supply.
Two of the three new demonstrators using TES are implementing similar technology and are being operated in a way to achieve similar purposes. These two demonstrators are the heat hub in Rotterdam and the short-term storage in London.
With 5000 m³ of water capacity is the heat hub in Rotterdam the largest storage facility in Celsius. The heat hub is used to balance heat supply and demand of the Rotterdam’s district heating. It stores hot water coming from several heat sources such as heat from a waste incineration plant and other combine head and power and boiler plants. The stored heat in form of hot water is then supplied to the Rotterdam’s district heating network. The heat hub provides such flexibility to the heating network that heat from waste sources can be recover also in times of low or no heat demand. It also allows combine heat and power to operate more efficiently. TES are often used to cut the daily peak load in heating systems.
The TES system in London is integrated with one of the local heat networks in Islington. In this case, it will integrate the waste heat coming from two different heat sources. These two sources are a ventilation shaft of the London underground and an electricity substation. The importance of the TES in this demonstrator relies on the seasonal change of the temperatures of the heat sources, and the heat demand. And the fact that the TES can be load from the heating network makes that it can supply heat when waste heat is not available and vice versa. Moreover, as the heat storage is also coupled with a CPH plant, it can provide the necessary flexibility so that the CHP supplies electricity and heat all year long.
Overall heat storage provides interesting technical capabilities to the heat network that could mean lower prices for end users, reduction of GHG emissions and less operation costs for energy utilities.
The replicability potential of the demonstrators under this section can be evaluated with a general medium and high score, according the replication matrices of the short-term storage and the heat hub demonstrators. The heat hub shows the higher replication potential, as it scores almost the higher values for the different monitored fields. For example, in the fields adaptability to different climate conditions, easy to implement (no needs of specific technical requirements), easy to operate (no needs of specific technical requirements) and opportunity of integrating waste energy sources, it scores the higher value, while only in the fields authorization easiness and CAPEX needed for the deployment of the solution scores the medium ones.
The key players on this topic are the energy utilities as they are the ones who must detect the opportunities that thermal energy storage can offer not only to the heat network but also to the end user and the environment. As network operators they should identify the business case and together with the municipality integrate it maybe with a support policy framework.
In the case of the London short-term storage the energy utility has a strong policy support from the ‘London plan’ and from the local planning guidance, which allows the utility to have planning conditions. In this case the city authorities play also an important role.
These kinds of thermal energy storage use sensible heat, i.e. hot water as medium material. These systems are rather inexpensive in comparison with electricity storage. Systems with a water capacity of between 5,000 and 10,000 m3 have an investment cost of 50-200 €m³ (Schmidt, 2011), which represent 0.5 -3.0 /kWh. Countries like Denmark are choosing larger TES, as the investment cost decreases with the size of the storage size. Further cost reductions for the utility can be achieved when using the TES in a smart way, for example for peak shaving or coupled with CHP plants.
Challenges and risks
The market maturity of sensible storage is no longer a barrier. The reliability of the technology is not a challenge. There are plenty of thermal energy storage maps available online, where the technology can be verified. TES is often associated with cogeneration, which has higher implementation rate in new building constructions around 10.2% (IEA-ETSAP and IRENA, 2013). Here, the challenge is to find the different heat resources e.g. waste heat, biomass, solar, etc. and plan the optimal combination of these resources with heat storage.
|No.||Project Name||Area (m2)||Year||Supplier|
|4||Nykoebing Sj.||20 084||2014||ARCON|
Table 1. List of large-scale Solar Plants in Denmark Pit Storage Thermal projects. (Frey, 2014)
The implementation of TES is also being successful in Danish district heating systems, where its main application is to increase the solar fraction and to shift the heat from summer to autumn or winter Most of the challenges are presented in other storage mediums like in the phase change materials and thermos-chemical storage, which can be used for other applications as for seasonal storage. These technologies are still not enough mature, and the costs are still relatively high (IEA-ETSAP and IRENA, 2013).